Roberto Sergio, CEO of Rai, did not hold back his strong words against television host Serena Bortone at the Foglio party in Venice. According to Sergio, Bortone deserved to be fired for her actions. This statement was made amidst the ongoing disciplinary proceedings against Bortone for publicly criticizing the company in regards to the case of author Marco Scurati.
Bortone had taken to social mass mezzi di comunicazione to express her disappointment and anger over Rai’s decision to cancel her interview with Scurati without any explanation. Her post read, “Without any explanation, they simply canceled the interview with Marco Scurati.” This caused quite a stir among Rai executives, leading to the initiation of disciplinary action against Bortone.
However, Sergio’s scathing remarks against Bortone have sparked a new debate. Some are applauding his bold stance against employees who criticize the company they work for, while others are questioning the fairness of such a statement. After all, isn’t freedom of speech a fundamental right?
Sergio believes that as an employee, it is not acceptable to publicly attack the company that pays your salary. He stated, “No employee, regardless of their position, is allowed to attack the company they work for. This is not an issue of freedom of speech, but rather respect and professionalism towards one’s employer.”
This incident has opened up a larger discussion about the responsibilities and boundaries of employees in the age of social mass mezzi di comunicazione. It also raises the question of whether companies have the right to restrict their employees from expressing their opinions about work-related matters in a public forum.
Bortone’s supporters argue that she was well within her rights to voice her disappointment over the cancellation of the interview. They also claim that her criticism was not a direct attack on Rai, but rather a genuine expression of her feelings towards the situation.
On the other hand, Sergio and Rai executives believe that Bortone’s actions have damaged the company’s reputation and have gone against the code of conduct expected from employees. The disciplinary proceedings against Bortone are seen as a way to maintain the company’s integrity and protect its image.
While the debate continues on whether Bortone should have been disciplined or not, it is clear that Sergio and Rai have taken a firm stance on the issue. However, this has not deterred Bortone from speaking her mind. In a recent Facebook post, she stated, “I do not intend to be silenced or threatened for expressing my opinions. I will continue to speak out and stand up for what I believe in.”
It is worth noting that this is not the first time Bortone has faced disciplinary action for her outspoken behavior. In 2019, she was suspended for two weeks for publicly criticizing the lack of women in prime-time television.
Some may view Bortone as a brave and outspoken woman who is not afraid to stand up for what she believes in, while others see her as a problematic employee who does not adhere to company policies. However, regardless of one’s opinion on the matter, this incident serves as a reminder of the power of social mass mezzi di comunicazione and the importance of being mindful of what one posts online.
In conclusion, while the debate on whether Bortone should have been disciplined remains ongoing, it is imperative for employees to understand their responsibilities and boundaries when it comes to expressing their opinions about their employer. It is also crucial for companies to have clear policies in place to regulate the behavior of their employees in the digital age. As for Bortone, only time will tell how this incident will impact her career at Rai.
